|
To Teaching at Eastman An Interview with Rebecca Penneys By Marcella Branagan Clavier Magazine, October 2001 continued... |
|
| What are your thoughts on early music study for child prodigies? There are pros and cons to starting children at an early age. I believe one thing strongly: the genes, background, and the environment, including the parents' outlook, all have to be wholesome. It is important that both parents and the child are content; parents should not put too much stress on their child's talent because emotional and psychological patterns might develop that can be problematic. Initially early development may open doors if the musical talent continues beyond the years of childhood. This is a tricky issue because as the child grows, future goals have to be reevaluated.
What were some of the important ideas from each person? Stein's teaching was structured, intellectual, and packed with knowledge. We covered theory, history, counterpoint, orchestration, 20th-century music, score reading, transcription, and ethnomusicology. Sometimes the lesson was two hours long, and he might invite me to come back again later in the week. This happened on a regular basis; life was spontaneous. The old-fashioned way to study was to spend an entire afternoon at the teacher's house. My introduction to chamber music was through Gregor Piatagorsky, the renowned cellist who decided I needed to play chamber music. My first lesson was at age 11 in his home where he told me an hour-long story about the Beethoven A Major Cello Sonata. He explained how the cello started, then discussed Beethoven's life and the concept of thematic transformation. Finally we played the piece, even though I could barely sightread the music. Afterwards he played two or three different recordings and gave me the assignment to learn the piece. That type of teaching is more personal than the typical teaching of today. Despite differences in teaching styles and even technical ideas, the long-range goals of freedom, flexibility, expression, and accuracy were the same with all my teachers. Another common thread was the notion of always being creative and stretching yourself in practice as well as in performance and always staying fresh. What are your memories of studying with Artur Rubinstein? After I played the Chopin Barcarolle, he remarked that it was very good and asked if I would like to hear him play it. As I listened and watched, I learned so much about what he did physically. This was the first time I was so close to a concert artist. Next he played the Chopin Bb Minor Sonata and several pieces he would perform in coming recitals. After about an hour and a half, we talked about his favorite writers, what it was like to live in Paris, and his philosophy of life. The following week we went through the same routine. I received wonderful images from him, and my sound started to change. He told me to sit down in a room alone and figure out what I wanted to say with the piano and how I wanted to say it. How did you come to study with Gyorgy Sebok and Janos Starker? There was always enough personal time. These teachers were performers who allowed students to get close and see how they worked. I went to their rehearsals and often turned pages. Those were truly golden years at Indiana, from 1969 to 1972. William Primrose, Josef Gingold, Abbey Simon, and Jorge Bolet all taught there then too. At Indiana I also studied some with Meneham Pressler and had composition with Iannis Xenakis. Why did you form the New Arts Trio? Do you think of yourself more as an artist or as a teacher? |
|
| Recordings by Rebecca Penneys |
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Page Design by Nikki George, Webster, NY nikki@georgetech.com |